I respect the opinion of people who had not read the documents of Harvard vs US on F-1 and J-1 visa programs, and/or argue from a standing of Free Speech and Academic Freedom. But I read the Lawsuit and I came out with a different impression. Harvard is misstating and misinterpreting the Administration and what happened, as inferred from the Exhibits, the Lawsuit and the request of a restraining order. It seems Harvard assumed too much and erroneously so, and its legal counsel might have too. And they did not appealed in time and manner what they complain about now, and that might not or should not fly in Court. For example there are different quoted numbers of affected: >5000, >7000, and one thing in the exhibits is more than 2,000 incoming for summer and fall quarters who already were accepted at Harvard. I have a Post of my analysis and comments of those documents, but, I am not a lawyer:
Thank you for your post.
I respect the opinion of people who had not read the documents of Harvard vs US on F-1 and J-1 visa programs, and/or argue from a standing of Free Speech and Academic Freedom. But I read the Lawsuit and I came out with a different impression. Harvard is misstating and misinterpreting the Administration and what happened, as inferred from the Exhibits, the Lawsuit and the request of a restraining order. It seems Harvard assumed too much and erroneously so, and its legal counsel might have too. And they did not appealed in time and manner what they complain about now, and that might not or should not fly in Court. For example there are different quoted numbers of affected: >5000, >7000, and one thing in the exhibits is more than 2,000 incoming for summer and fall quarters who already were accepted at Harvard. I have a Post of my analysis and comments of those documents, but, I am not a lawyer:
https://federicosotodelalba.substack.com/p/on-harvard-versus-united-states?r=4up0lp
Crumblingstiltskin and his ilk most definitely are.